thats all phatznet shows right now, and I know thats not the complete ban list , doesnt show any of the older bans that Im sure are still in effect. And now I've been banned as well with no reason given.Lifeline (Banned on 24 maj 2009 20:13 by Khriestie) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Exhuman (Banned on 24 maj 2009 20:09 by Khriestie) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Marquind (Banned on 21 maj 2009 21:48 by Bombadoc) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Drakthol (Banned on 21 maj 2009 21:47 by Bombadoc) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Wolves (Banned on 21 maj 2009 1:43 by Khriestie) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Malliona (Banned on 21 maj 2009 1:41 by Khriestie) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Daylight1 (Banned on 21 maj 2009 1:40 by Khriestie) Reason: Violating phatznet side agreement Permanent Ban? Yes
Does anyone think this is just? Or a good idea?
ask yourself....
Are you punishing these players or force them to create a third faction in Camelot ?
Do you want phatznet drama to spill into tara?
Do you want alternate clan RI's waiting in the tara room while the cameloot RI tries to defend box?
Do you really want to try and OD two enemy raid forces at Camelot? Isn't one enough?
You are taking a temporary situation in pande and turning it into a long term , game wide conflict. This is not resoloving the issue, you are pouring gasoline on a fire.
Reconsider these decisions.
I'm not trying to sound threatening, just realistic