I don't understand this 5 vs 0. There are always people online in AO its just because you might not be there that this cant happen because its attached to EPEEN.
Some of the best wars Rk2 ever saw was not the 70 v 70 battles but the 10 v 10s that decided the site. And if you want more 70 v 70 battles wouldn't you want the site to change hands more to entice more pvp.
Think about it, if one side loses a site at say their down hour then the next time the site cycles through their main hour it switches hands. The timers shouldn't be 24hr cycles or make it every 6hrs the site has a 50% chance to open (throwing random things out there)
Basically all you should take from this is that if you want more pvp battles to happen sites should change hands more often, only way to do that open them up to more players because as it stands now nothing will happen and whats better losing a site to a 10 v 10 then creating a 70 v 70 battle the next day or going weeks without seeing a tower get hit... That's what I don't understand about this, the more towers change hands even if to a small team skirmish the better AO will be...so far its just flames from people to keep the EPEEN alive of holding towers... Get over it you won towers after merge can we move on and create more pvp now?