Over the years I have always enjoyed coming to the anarchy forums and reading the latest news about the game. However I have never been one to post except a few times here and there. PVP twinking has always been my favorite past time in this game and this topic has me interested enough to put my opinion out there.
I think most people are missing out on the reason why these changes have been proposed in the first place. The game needs less BS deadspots, WE need more active battlestations. This, along with balance, should be the priority above all else when it comes to picking out these new pvp ranges. I think the answer is title levels:
1-14
15-49
50-99
100-149
150-189
190-204
205-220
TL1 I wouldnt expect to run too often, TL2 has already been proven to work, TL3 has a good number of tower and totw twinks, TL4 I would expect to be slow at first until we start seeing 149 s10 twinks (TL4 has always been my favorite pvp level), TL5 will of course run, TL6 assuming a 200 twink becomes popular shouldnt be a problem. TL7 again will run.
Will the bottom levels be at a disadvantage? You bet, but I think they will be competitve while still allowing the number of BS ranges to be consolidated. I see a lot of suggestions with a new title level being the top of the ranges. 50/60, 100, 150, 190/200 I think this is a bad idea, as some major items are balanced around title level and a TL5 shouldnt be dominating the TL4 range. Deciding on the level of your twink should be just as important as what equipment you put on. You should never be able to have it all, be it dungeon twink, BS twink or tower twink. Not to forget, THERE SHOULD ALWAYS BE A BIGGER FISH, except for 220's