Well if your point was:Originally posted by Demona66
Read again my post before you replay
You completly missed the point.
A LOT OF NANO - 386n vs "a little nano"- 25n
then you missed my point.
As for your point on changing roots to take in account that something more advanced then the "50% chance to break" rule, i'd agree. As long as it makes "spam rooting" more nano expensive then it is now.