Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 82

Thread: More penalties for tower griefers please

  1. #1

    More penalties for tower griefers please

    4 hours pvp flag is not enough for prevent people from griefing towers, especially on tl4+. Make more penalties, like every new attack with 4h flag temporary reducing attacker's skills by 5%.
    Make WAR, not love!

  2. #2
    You are actually starting to hate old clan tactics? I think the penalty is fair enough now, people sit it in 100% area anyway, even if it was 8 hours. Maybe if the first attacker at towers (was it griefer or not) got 5min non-removable root on him/her?
    Taranide 220/30 fixer RK2 and now also RK1! Wait a second...
    Might have other characters too but I'm not so sure, always leave them camping something and there they are for few months.


  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    4 hours pvp flag is not enough for prevent people from griefing towers, especially on tl4+. Make more penalties, like every new attack with 4h flag temporary reducing attacker's skills by 5%.
    Let me guess Bruce found out that now that omni dont have towers to worry about they can attack clan as they wish- without clan being able to really do anything to stop them from. Pure Bruce :/

    You should have known though that taking all the towers for one side will come with consiquences <3

    Btw is that omni or clam Beast week? Couse if its clam its disabler time.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Taranide
    Maybe if the first attacker at towers (was it griefer or not) got 5min non-removable root on him/her?
    Not really sinse while some classes will be able to servive that easily enought classes based on using range would become sitting duck

    No need for any extra penalty- if you have towers prepare to defend them (if needed every time they open specially during every pvm raid)- thats why they open to attack every copple of hours and not only when other side brings 100 people to attack.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  5. #5
    Nerf...

    Well how about some drain in skills? That should bite a bit.
    Taranide 220/30 fixer RK2 and now also RK1! Wait a second...
    Might have other characters too but I'm not so sure, always leave them camping something and there they are for few months.


  6. #6
    Attacking random open bases by one char IS griefing and need more penalties for that.
    Make WAR, not love!

  7. #7
    Don't ask for stuff that you'll regret one day.

    Enjoying RK4

    STATUS OF SKY: Not Falling


    Gimp is a state of mind, nerfest is a state of being.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    Attacking random open bases by one char IS griefing and need more penalties for that.
    Bases are open to be attacked. No matter if by single person or by copple of teams. And btw single person can take a base perfectly fine (as in it happened before) if nobody comes to defend- so defend them each time they are attacked and stop whining.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    Attacking random open bases by one char IS griefing and need more penalties for that.
    Maybe that person is trying to make even the slightest difference for their faction. Especially if they are not in an organization. Perhaps they are just trying to do their part in the ongoing fight between the clans and Omni-Tek. Having towers puts a big fat target on your organization. Everyone should know that. If towers are open to attack then someone shouldn't be hesitant to attack them if it's their enemies towers. What your asking is to take the war out of the Notum Wars.

  10. #10
    Btw for the matter of fact 220 attacking for exemple 200 field can take single towers perfectly fine even before attackers arrive- so it aint griefing its doing best he can for victory of his side.

    Even better if it happens while the enemy org is busy fighting elsewhere- this way he also helps his side by preventing the other side from getting pvm advantages.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  11. #11
    o! better idea for penalty - people with towerflags should be not able to use grid/fgrid. If they want attack random towers - well, but they need walk thru all RK and cant meep when defenders comes.
    Make WAR, not love!

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    o! better idea for penalty - people with towerflags should be not able to use grid/fgrid. If they want attack random towers - well, but they need walk thru all RK and cant meep when defenders comes.
    Again not really. 4 hours flag is enought.

    Pure Bruce just found out that just taking every tower then braggin about it nonstop aint really gonna work- you will actually have to protect those towers to keep them. 24/7 for days weeks and months if needed.

    Well those are the rules of the game actually- towers are never intended to be permanent for your side- if you want them you must be prepared to protect them every time they are open. If not- terminate them yourself and let somebody else fill the spots.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by seventshadow
    Again not really. 4 hours flag is enought.
    .
    Enough for what? For catching some 163 ga fixer who meeping when see any defender and goin attack another base? Nope.

    Repeating, ill talking about griefing, not about valid attack
    Make WAR, not love!

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    Enough for what? For catching some 163 ga fixer who meeping when see any defender and goin attack another base? Nope.

    Repeating, ill talking about griefing, not about valid attack
    163 ga fixer can perfectly fine take out say 150 base- if nobody coming to defend it. And you may come to first base he will attack- you wont come to 10 th though. And sinse NW is all about taking towers he did exectly what he should do.

    To put the crap aside NW is exectly about that- attacking the other side every time when something open till it gets tired and gives up- plenty of timers a side started dominating exectly this way (for exemple last clan victory).

    So Bruce while the idea of keeping towers permanently for your side is funny basicly keep dreaming- and defending them 24/7 without sleeping or eating if you want to keep them.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by seventshadow
    163 ga fixer can perfectly fine take out say 150 base- if nobody coming to defend it. And you may come to first base he will attack- you wont come to 10 th though. And sinse NW is all about taking towers he did exectly what he should do.

    To put the crap aside NW is exectly about that- attacking the other side every time when something open till it gets tired and gives up- plenty of timers a side started dominating exectly this way (for exemple last clan victory).

    So Bruce while the idea of keeping towers permanently for your side is funny basicly keep dreaming- and defending them 24/7 without sleeping or eating if you want to keep them.

    For some1 who cant understand: its GRIEFING. Not valid pvp tactic. Want base - bring force and take it. Cant bring force - leave towers alone.
    Make WAR, not love!

  16. #16
    If they outlaw this, they're gonna have to outlaw fixers too

    Hit and run is a valid tactic, just gotta deal with it... they'll get bored eventually
    Revelator: There is no FC love that will fix gimpness of the mind

    Warning! If you ever see my use "lol" in any of my posts, I'm not serious!

  17. #17
    So we're only allowed to attack if we're going to take the whole base? We're not allowed to fight a war of attrition like you did?

    Maybe we should /tell you and arrange times when its convenient for us to attack your towers, would that help you too.

    Enjoying RK4

    STATUS OF SKY: Not Falling


    Gimp is a state of mind, nerfest is a state of being.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    For some1 who cant understand: its GRIEFING. Not valid pvp tactic. Want base - bring force and take it. Cant bring force - leave towers alone.
    You call it griefing- i call any tactic that allows to take towers a valid tactic. And sinse like i said fixer attacking sites till defenders get tired then taking sites is a working tactic- i see no problem with it.

    Hell dont even need to take tower site- if you manage to take down even single tower you did what you are sippose to do in NM.

    So Bruce stop posting and keep defending
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by seventshadow
    You call it griefing- i call any tactic that allows to take towers a valid tactic.
    They NOT got any towers by that tactic. And cant get because defenders comes and he even not trying to fight - just meeping away.

    Repeat suggestion - more penalties and all be ok.
    Make WAR, not love!

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    They NOT got any towers by that tactic. And cant get because defenders comes and he even not trying to fight - just meeping away.
    And like i said- by the 10 th (or 20 th) towers he will attack defenders just wont come anymore- so he will take them just fine. Or even if he ruined single tower before defenders come he already did his job. So i see no problem wiht it- your towers are attacked- come and defend them- no matter if its single attacker or 50 title 5 n00bs you brought.

    Quote Originally Posted by Brucelee2003
    Repeat suggestion - more penalties and all be ok.
    And again- no. Things are fine as they are. If you have towers prepare to defend them- thats what they are open once per day for.
    Build a fire to somebody and you provide him with a heat and a light for a night. Put somebody on fire and you provide him with a heat and a light for the rest of his life.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •