I was trying to offer ideas on how to change the way towers operate in 5% gas instead of arguing to get rid of it completely.Originally posted by Kuroshio
I'm saying like it or not, until there is a viable solution ready to be implemented (which we won't hear about until it's done), we might have to live with the current system. In fact, I'd prefer to live with the current system than have the 5% gas yanked.
The current system provides for pressure on the Funcom programmers and developers to change it. Yanking the 5% suppresion would solve the problem but it removes that pressure. I do it all the time at work: unless my boss specifically tells me to do something the hard (but often correct) way, I will opt for the quickest way possible. It's not because I'm a bad employee. It's because in a 24 hour day my schedule is allocated for about 26 hours of work,, only 8 of which I'm actually working. Same goes for Funcom.
Do you not agree that, with some tweaking and additional brainstorming, the proposal I laid out in my last post would be a potential "fix" for the current problems revolving around large battles in 5% suppression?
If you don't agree, how about putting out ideas instead of saying "live with it" or "it's going to be this way, like it or not." That's not very productive.