Die

[sike]

Asking for Nerfs will be the end of AO. It almost was for me. I am a 164 agent and ive been through LOTS of agent nerfs. Conceal and AS being the main 2.

You are asking for MA's and Fixers to be nerfed basically cause they kicked your arse in PVP.

I invite you to meet me in MMD and I will show you a Whoopin' lke you aint never seen.

I can go doc and heal as fast as a doc, I can go trader and Strip all of your skills and kill you with crits, or i can just stay as an agent and murder your *****in' arse with small but mighty crit buffs.

Now, where are the people asking for the agent nerf?

[sike]

This was supposed to be in reply to Wongs attack on fixers and MA's. Read that thread to the end then come back to this one and it will make sense =))

Me say Doh

[_______________Vydas]

Actually, it maes sense as an independent entity. All nerf mongers must die .

[Zamolcrat]

I personally volunteer to help at the execution of all nerf mongers.
Fear the anti-nerf police !

[Blackwing]

and nerf the importance of single player pvp.

you know as i made my 2 main ao chars, the ones i like most and return to always sooner or later i accepted and expected them to suck at pvp.

my favorite professions are bureaucrat and fixer.

i pretty much agree on the 3 tier state posted somewhere where it says that the fighter professions should be able to kick the others around unless the others are beefed to the gills.

enforcer, soldier, martial artist should be able to win in most situations. why? because that is what their profession is all about.
they should be able to deal AND take massive damage.

agent and nanotech should be able to win if they get the drop on you. why? because dealing massive damage but not being able to take it is what their profession is all about.
unsure wether to group them with the secondary fighters or prime killers.

then the rest, the secondary fighters like adv, fixer, trader, blah blah. who can beat a prime fighter if they are superbly equipped and get the drop on them.

then we have those who just cant fight like doctors, crats...

i find this tier idea very logical and workable. i sometimes like character roles and ideas as ópposed to reducing them to stats like attack, evades armor and health.

but somehow, somewhere the notion sprang up that any class should be able to kill any other class in pvp SOLO.

WHY?

[Whiteboog]

By saying that after nerfing you can skill own in pvp arent you really saying that the nerfing was a good idea because it made the battles fair :/

[_Bonk_]

People can ask away for nerfs for all I care. The ball is in Funcom's court and they need to look at the complaints and see if there really is something to them and if there is then they should change it. They should not just keep changing things though because a loud rude minority here on the boards wants it.

I doubt Funcom will be another Verant in this regard.

[Turin]

Originally posted by Blackwing
and nerf the importance of single player pvp.

you know as i made my 2 main ao chars, the ones i like most and return to always sooner or later i accepted and expected them to suck at pvp.

my favorite professions are bureaucrat and fixer.

i pretty much agree on the 3 tier state posted somewhere where it says that the fighter professions should be able to kick the others around unless the others are beefed to the gills.

enforcer, soldier, martial artist should be able to win in most situations. why? because that is what their profession is all about.
they should be able to deal AND take massive damage.

agent and nanotech should be able to win if they get the drop on you. why? because dealing massive damage but not being able to take it is what their profession is all about.
unsure wether to group them with the secondary fighters or prime killers.

then the rest, the secondary fighters like adv, fixer, trader, blah blah. who can beat a prime fighter if they are superbly equipped and get the drop on them.

then we have those who just cant fight like doctors, crats...

i find this tier idea very logical and workable. i sometimes like character roles and ideas as ópposed to reducing them to stats like attack, evades armor and health.

but somehow, somewhere the notion sprang up that any class should be able to kill any other class in pvp SOLO.

WHY?

Why? Because they want everyone to be able to enjoy themselves regardless of what faction of the game they want to play, PVM or PvP. Thats why. Soldiers, MA's and Enforcers think they hsould own EVERYONE, and soldiers most of all. i heard one say, in all seriousness, that there shouldnt be any single professions that can stand up to them at all, and that they should own anything on two legs.

And if you dont think docs can fight... come fight me. Ill show you how little they can fight.

Im tired of the nerf cryers. F you all. If you ask for a nerf, i hope something personally BAD happens to you and your character. I hope you go out to get in uor car, and have all flat tires or something, then come in to call a tow truck... you wait a while for him, decide to log into AO, and notice that ALL of your equipment is gone, and your skills were cut in half.

/rant off.

[Cenelia]

*grins*
I liked CZ's reply to that topic hehe

as for that w(r)ong-guy, I hope fc nerfs ITS char(not prof hehe)

[Arvec]

*flashes badge* Anti-nerf police here.

About the bracer nerf that's coming up...they bribed me with free donuts until patch 14.6 so unfortunately there's nothing I can do.

*chomps donut* *sips coffee*

Oh yeah, forgot the new regulations.

NT's are the essence of nerf-dom (nert-techs) and if spotted, will be severely beaten with stun-rods. Thank you for your time.

*walks away hitting himself with stun-rod*

[Blackwing]

Originally posted by Turin



Why? Because they want everyone to be able to enjoy themselves regardless of what faction of the game they want to play, PVM or PvP. Thats why. Soldiers, MA's and Enforcers think they hsould own EVERYONE, and soldiers most of all. i heard one say, in all seriousness, that there shouldnt be any single professions that can stand up to them at all, and that they should own anything on two legs.

And if you dont think docs can fight... come fight me. Ill show you how little they can fight.

Im tired of the nerf cryers. F you all. If you ask for a nerf, i hope something personally BAD happens to you and your character. I hope you go out to get in uor car, and have all flat tires or something, then come in to call a tow truck... you wait a while for him, decide to log into AO, and notice that ALL of your equipment is gone, and your skills were cut in half.

/rant off.

seriously if you want a fighter dont play a doc.

that docs are feared tank - fighters in ao is totally wrong.

there is something as a role in a team that people should fulfill and this role extends towards pvp.

i am sorry but i am not interested in pvp in a game where the healers and merchants own everybody while the ranged and close combat specialists run screaming.

your arguments are flawed. you have another opinion fine.but seriously you should see a doctor about your attitude problems.

[Gearbox]

Nerf Agents!!!

[dan09]

only thing i dont get is why people reckon soilders ma's etc should win PvP.

how does anyone get off saying that any one class should excel in PvP? we all play different chars races etc to do one thing, play a game. Each and every class should have advs and dis advs in PvP.

Its like the real version of chess, its meant to challenge you and the system rules that you play by. There are no pre-reqs to that, its just PvP? I dont know of any game that doesnt try and give all sides different ups and downs but an overall balance in the end. Why would this game be any different?

more over why would anyone want that to be different?
play even

[Doncaballero]

If you were choosing a character to play, with an interest in engaging in PvP, based on their descriptions and a common sense knowledge of what their professions should mean, which would you pick? A soldier, or a doctor? Well, stupid me for picking a soldier.

Can I have my 43 days of playtime back yet?

[Beartwo]

Originally posted by DNA
only thing i dont get is why people reckon soilders ma's etc should win PvP.

how does anyone get off saying that any one class should excel in PvP? we all play different chars races etc to do one thing, play a game. Each and every class should have advs and dis advs in PvP.

Its like the real version of chess, its meant to challenge you and the system rules that you play by. There are no pre-reqs to that, its just PvP? I dont know of any game that doesnt try and give all sides different ups and downs but an overall balance in the end. Why would this game be any different?

more over why would anyone want that to be different?
play even

...... do I have to explain that to you, or do you have Atrox blood in there?