Yeah, sure, every single nano in this line is designed to block those overpowiered fixer hots ...
Asasello, Sottcapo, Ciex, Rychu, Ciek, Zomowiec, Ciekafsky, Rysiek, Chinaski, Libertarian, Propertarian.
It clearly looks like not working as intended.
But anyway...
Exploit or not, nr 90% Recharge time 1s thats anyway not balanced for a CH blocker.
Isnt 1s enough to use stun perk?
Asasello, Sottcapo, Ciex, Rychu, Ciek, Zomowiec, Ciekafsky, Rysiek, Chinaski, Libertarian, Propertarian.
Its official
I asked Metaing to pleas clarify it.
And:[Metaing]: since nobody from FC have said it is bugged, you should assume it is working as intended
Now this doesn't mean that Doc isnt the best FP for you, it means that when RI is in the game you have to withdraw that from the Doc FP "benefit" scale, and THEN decide on what FP thats the best one for you... If you find that its still FP doc DESPITE RI being in the game, then good for you...[Metaing]: and giving agents new FPable nanos, wasn't done for agents to stay Doc even more
Thank you Metaing for finally clearing it out.
My comment wasnt a whine, but it only stated that if it is meant to block CH.
It has to have 4 secs recharge, just like other nanos in this line, and check the others, even if NR def gets lower 140 -> 120 -> 90 "balanced" by cast time increasing 6 -> 8 -> 10 or 11?.
Recharge not changing.
But "OMG don't change RI it has a Working as intended brand!!one!1!"
Gi "Kerius" Mp
Coolest MP ever !
And i would have agreed with you but you and your friends just HAD to push me and every single other soldier that might have agreed with you over the edge by making 10million whine threads all over the forums, maybe its unfair that someone that had a valid complaint gets affected by that but hey, blame your fellow agents not me...
Now its:
Working As Intended
And should not be changed in any way...
Seems the "we want other FPs to be viable" back lashed. FC gave a little less incentive to FP doc and a little more incentive to FP something else.
From what I know of Rktim I don't think he made it up
"Working as intended" isn't the same as the recharge being "fair" though. I think it's a thoroughly relevant discussion, but everyone is sick of the RI threads so agents kinda ruined it for themselves.
Last edited by Avari; Jan 22nd, 2009 at 17:18:01.
Avari 220/30/80 - Araghos 220/30/80 - Shishido 220/30/7x - Araninn 220/30/80
Originally Posted by Tergx
thats fair enough maybe he was just soothsaying.
id like to see these devs play an agent on rk2 with all the sols we have there the nano is being used to a laughable degree.
still metaing maybe said he thinks its working as intended but i have yet to see an official response. on wether it was a mistake(i doubt fc ever have made mistake lol) or yes they agree it needs adjusting.or no agents shudnt fp doc anymore and its working fine.
in any case i have a reply and a "whine" if that will please the trolls out there.
this r rly funneh, sols can nerf basicly 1 prof cause ri is usueless on anything else, and your gonna bitch about it. try playing a sol when 3 ppl can make your only defense unuseable.
Been there done that, I did not cry because NTs got new nukes, or traders some seriously needed love.
They where needed to keep soldiers in check, period.
Furthermore you might wanna read up on game mechanics, because you seam to be under the illusion that agents only have one profession: soldier with RI that can set them out of play.
Until you go read up on some hard facts, on well known PvP mechanics please refrain from littering the forum with ill thought up posts.
Enter the Information Age
Proc Descriptions
Hunt, and be hunted: The Hunting Grounds | Alien Tower Field :Aliens, that really invade!
Pet argo management: Servants Protection | Expand the Notum Silo :Make it worthwhile
Rimor
Tesgri - 220|17|58 (Omni Agent)
Leara - 220|25|62 (Omni Doctor)
Ponygirl - 220|25|56 (Omni Bureaucrat)
Means: "We have done way dumber things than this..."
now ur being short sighted.just because i complain about one debuff doesnt mean there isnt another 5+ that disable my only defence.
i dont mind sols having a ch blocker but when it lands 90% of the time on first cast AND is spammable its a bit stupid.
its up to u to petition a change to the nanos effecting u. dont come to me looking for a fix.if you arent asking for a fix dont bring it up since its not an issue.