Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 92

Thread: So FC

  1. #41
    Yeah Sil flat out hates engineers, pretty much why. There the damage templets were off apparently, the 2 lowers were at "old" level the 1 upper was at current, our ar boost would drop it in to the current, so they went with the oddball damage templet instead of the normal ones.
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

  2. #42

  3. #43
    thanx for listing out a bunch of 7 year old nano's that barely worked when they where new and comp trade skills that we didnt need.

    Oh and cocoon isnt engie specific so it doesnt count.

    Klod you realy only have maybe 2 more retarded posts left before i do what everyone else has done and add you to my ignore list.
    Quote Originally Posted by egadsrk2 View Post
    In the case of this little drama, Party A created a situation. Party B perpetuated it with name calling. Party A finished it with violence...
    I was "party A"

  4. #44
    Klod, for the love of god please stop making yourself look like an idiot...

    Over half of those were in game since before either of us were in game, and long before Sil was GM. 1 is a Direct copy of an origional RK nano with "must not be in shadowlands" removed and the skill requirement over doubled, and a Typo that lets us cast it with the old one. 1 is so little of an improvement over the old one that the only reason people use it is because it last longer then 37s. And the last one is our most pointless buff...
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

  5. #45

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Uaintseenme View Post
    thanx for listing out a bunch of 7 year old nano's
    That's my point. You had cool stuff even before I was born. Noone hates you, it's just that other professions are finaly getting some cool stuff that was way overdue.

    Klod you realy only have maybe 2 more retarded posts left before i do what everyone else has done and add you to my ignore list.
    Ignorance is bliss.

    Quote Originally Posted by Technogen View Post
    Klod, for the love of god please stop making yourself look like an idiot...
    Well, it takes one to know one.

    Over half of those were in game since before either of us were in game, and long before Sil was GM. 1 is a Direct copy of an origional RK nano with "must not be in shadowlands" removed and the skill requirement over doubled, and a Typo that lets us cast it with the old one. 1 is so little of an improvement over the old one that the only reason people use it is because it last longer then 37s.
    Oh, my. Wish I had that stuff before.

    And the last one is our most pointless buff...
    To be continued...

    Quote Originally Posted by gergiskoo View Post
    lol @ coon being engi lub
    You trying to say it's hate?
    Proud member of Shadow Ops
    Renowned jester of the double AS Tigress

    MP setup
    Hidden message
    Quote Originally Posted by Klod View Post
    You won.
    Making them feel special since 2008.



  7. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Uaintseenme View Post
    yes its pretty much content that we had taken away from us 3 patches ago with a bit of a hp boost and a new white mesh.

    Why we couldnt have just had a hp boost on our old 219 pet instead of a nerfing is giving me bad logic induced headaches.

    Can anyone remember what justification was given for the nerfing of our old dog?
    Just intrested to know why it was nerfed and then what massive change in game caused them to rethink the nerfing and then serve a fix up under the banner of "new content"
    its not bad logic, its Funcom Logic(tm)

    and if i recall correctly, the new claim of a "nerf" to the dog was infact, a requested fix by engies at the time. but then they realized the fix was worse than the bug. and now they call it a nerf.

    Level 1 to 300 in 8 Years! Pwn!
    - Join us on Discord! -
    AO WIKI!
    Arcanum!


  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowgod View Post
    its not bad logic, its Funcom Logic(tm)

    and if i recall correctly, the new claim of a "nerf" to the dog was infact, a requested fix by engies at the time. but then they realized the fix was worse than the bug. and now they call it a nerf.
    Read what I said about it, and sil at the time said about it. "The lower templets were the higher ones." He chose to go with the "higher" templets that gave less damage when it could have gone the other way.

    Wording is kinda bad here's numbers.

    1 2 3 4 5

    1 2 and 3 are higher damage templets.
    4 and 5 are lower damage templets (the actual bug)
    Sil chose to make 1 2 3 match 4 5 so the dogs damage is now lower for same amout of AR.
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Klod View Post
    That's my point. You had cool stuff even before I was born. Noone hates you, it's just that other professions are finaly getting some cool stuff that was way overdue.
    no, we had potentialy cool nano's that didnt work as intended even when new just like i said in that post, it barely worked then.
    Oh and i think snipping quotes to suit your purpose counts as a retarded post I think, only one more dude.
    Quote Originally Posted by egadsrk2 View Post
    In the case of this little drama, Party A created a situation. Party B perpetuated it with name calling. Party A finished it with violence...
    I was "party A"

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Uaintseenme View Post
    yes its pretty much content that we had taken away from us 3 patches ago with a bit of a hp boost and a new white mesh.

    Why we couldnt have just had a hp boost on our old 219 pet instead of a nerfing is giving me bad logic induced headaches.

    Can anyone remember what justification was given for the nerfing of our old dog?
    Just intrested to know why it was nerfed and then what massive change in game caused them to rethink the nerfing and then serve a fix up under the banner of "new content"
    ha and i was just joking that it would be the same AR, is that confirmed? that just might be the lamest joke ever.
    Quote Originally Posted by Means View Post
    Dirty Underpants of Bungerman
    Runspeed: - 1989
    Sense: -314
    Intelligence: -50

    These befouled undergarments are painfully confining having previously belonged to a detail-oriented individual with much smaller genitals. Walking is difficult...running is impossible. Stains of a dubious nature adorn both the front and back of these "tighty-whities". Noxious fumes make your eyes burn and your nose run while wearing these. One can only imagine what you are doing wearing them.

  11. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by Uaintseenme View Post
    no, we had potentialy cool nano's that didnt work as intended even when new just like i said in that post, it barely worked then.
    As I said, I wish I had your "broken" toolset back then.

    Oh and i think snipping quotes to suit your purpose counts as a retarded post I think, only one more dude.
    If someone wants to read the remaining blocks of text (mostly useless and filled with personal insults), there's still link to original post in the text I quoted. I don't understand what's the big deal.
    Proud member of Shadow Ops
    Renowned jester of the double AS Tigress

    MP setup
    Hidden message
    Quote Originally Posted by Klod View Post
    You won.
    Making them feel special since 2008.



  12. #52
    You know, if pet pathing worked engineers would be pretty good. You got one of the top tool sets defensively imo, and if your pets could reach your target you'd also be rather good defensively too.
    Avari 220/30/80 - Araghos 220/30/80 - Shishido 220/30/7x - Araninn 220/30/80

    Quote Originally Posted by Tergx
    If one of the few traders are PvPing around you and land GTH on you, take a trip to decon and it will be gone. What's the big deal hehe.

  13. #53
    Ill assume 2nd ded was meant to be off, problem is our pets took a major damage hit with LE. Adverage hit is 1k, and with all the crit resist in game they don't get the high crits that made them deadly before.
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

  14. #54
    I really wish some people would at least make an effort to get minimal clue before posting. The whole nonsense about our supposedly great defensive power is becoming boring to read - Engineer defense is exactly the same as it was 4 years ago at release of Shadowlands. Any "upgrades" it received after that is only thanks to non proffesion specific item that anyone can access and use. Other than that , its just the same as it was, we have, for example, no improved life channeleres, no new team heals, no new hots, and no % heal modifier on every single new item that makes it to every patch.

    Its just about the only defense that remains completely untouched by this dev team since Silirion took over, MA were the other one but the seem to be getting new heal now (about bloody damn time, too).

    Pet pathing wasnt working , isnt working, and it wont be never working on an acceptable level , its not a factor that anyone is willing or interested in disscussing - most of us have accepted that and moved over to other areas that need immidiate attention.
    Last edited by IHaveHugeNick; Aug 22nd, 2008 at 19:21:14.

  15. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by IHaveHugeNick View Post
    Engineer defense is exactly the same as it was 4 years ago at release of Shadowlands.
    I.E., excellent.
    Proud member of Shadow Ops
    Renowned jester of the double AS Tigress

    MP setup
    Hidden message
    Quote Originally Posted by Klod View Post
    You won.
    Making them feel special since 2008.



  16. #56
    Idk klod, our blockers are about due for an upgrade. Examp, a fixer can go through our blockers, Fling, burst, As, 6s Fling, 2s burst, 3s AS, 1s fling. (Blockers gone) total attack time = 12s. After that FA, AS, Burst, Fling, Possibly AS again and I'm dead. Coon is only 30s every 2 min, so a fixer that knows what they are doing can kill an engineer in under a 1 min 30s. Granted not all professions can eat though our blockers, but those that can tend to have normal hits that can kill us anyways.

    *edit* mind you I'm not tring to say engies def sucks, but its not as great as it was pre LE.
    Last edited by Technogen; Aug 22nd, 2008 at 19:49:58.
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

  17. #57
    1st question is:
    Why OP put space into SoFC (Spear of Forbidden Ceremonies) in title?
    2nd question is:
    Why OP and this thread are totally derailed?

    P.S.: Technogen said that competent fixer can kill engi under 1:30...
    Kuznechik, Board member of Disciples of Omni-Tek (and few dozens of alts)
    DoOT is recruiting
    -------
    Well, as a well-known fact - I know nothing (especially about engineers).

  18. #58
    Kuz, fight rocker, ignoring the fact that you personally suck horribly hat pvp have nick fight rocker.
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

  19. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by Technogen View Post
    Idk klod, our blockers are about due for an upgrade. Examp, a fixer can go through our blockers, Fling, burst, As, 6s Fling, 2s burst, 3s AS, 1s fling. (Blockers gone) total attack time = 12s. After that FA, AS, Burst, Fling, Possibly AS again and I'm dead. Coon is only 30s every 2 min, so a fixer that knows what they are doing can kill an engineer in under a 1 min 30s. Granted not all professions can eat though our blockers, but those that can tend to have normal hits that can kill us anyways.
    OMG, a fixer can kill you... Maybe. Oo You have to die from someone.

    *edit* mind you I'm not tring to say engies def sucks, but its not as great as it was pre LE.
    I know, but it didn't change that much (the major nerfs - coon nerf affected you the least, reflect nerf as well).
    Proud member of Shadow Ops
    Renowned jester of the double AS Tigress

    MP setup
    Hidden message
    Quote Originally Posted by Klod View Post
    You won.
    Making them feel special since 2008.



  20. #60
    Klod, for the love of god learn to read the whole post before you reply, you just make yourself look like an idiot when you don't.

    Also, most if not all professions got more or faster specials with LE weaponry.

    Yes, we don't get a 10k AS or FA as much as enfs do but it does happen if our blockers get chewed up. By no means do I want us to be gods of defence, but you can not say our defence was not weakened with LE.
    "A whole new place to run around for ages in then die suddenly without warning."

    "I know who coded pet pathing... and when I see him I say "/follow" and I start waling in to walls :P"

    The "Trolls" option is incorrect. The term trolls is not used to describe the gathering of information on the Internet.

    <@Kintaii> L2P

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •