Although the foregoing analysis was prepared by an employee of Omni-Tek of Rubi-Ka Corporation ("OTRK"), it has been drafted almost exclusively with a view to those Clans who are not signatory to the Ares Pact. It has been prepared in the interests of peace and in the hope that what little political stability remains on Rubi-Ka can indeed be preserved.
A LEGAL COMMENT ON THE ARES PACT
The Ares Pact is indeed a disturbing, oppressive document – not only for an employee of OTRK, but also for the members of the Clan community. It is disturbing in the sense that, by the action of very few, they can simply and effectively condemn the planet to a state of war; it is oppressive because it is heavily biased to the detriment of Clans whose members number less than 100.
OPPRESSION OF NON-SIGNATORY CLANS
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect is that whether the non-signatory Clans realize it or not, they are bound to the Ares Pact by virtue of its vague and presumptuous statements. This is made quite clear by two casual, passive observations: (i) the Preamble to the Ares Pact clearly states "[w]e, the members of the Clans, in order to bring unity and peace to our land, have hereby joined in the Council of Ares…" [emphasis added]; and (ii) despite consistently referring to the "guilds that form the Council of Ares", the language mentioned in subsection (i) above, coupled with the evident fact that the Ares Pact fails to list the Clans who are signatory thereto, convincingly implies that the Council of Ares represents all Clans.
For those of you who may hold the opinion (and who have believed the Council’s statements to date that it is merely a "defensive alliance"), Article 1 of the Ares Pact states quite clearly that it is a "military alliance", and that it is the "aim of the alliance to provide a common defense for all members of the Clans" [emphasis added]. The implications of these statements of purpose are clear: (i) the Council of Ares is an explicit military machine, and apparently has no interest, in spite of claims made in Article 11, in engaging in the political affairs of the Clan community; (ii) this is qualified, however, by stating that its "aim" is common defense; and (iii) whether the Clan community accepts it or not, the Council of Ares will defend you, even if that very action means drawing you into war.
The duplicity of the Council in drafting the Ares Pact is revealed with specific reference to its "aim". A cursory reading of the Ares Pact would indeed make it seem as if that was the Council’s only purpose and intention. However, as it is only an "aim" and not a sole and/or exclusive duty, the Council is granted a great deal of room to manoeuvre around this language without notice, and thereby betray the very Clans it has bound and the Clans it supposedly protects.
The Council reveals this betrayal, and the true nature of its intent, in Article 11, by stating that "It is the duty of the guilds to: …actively participate in all initiatives to establish an effective government for the Clans." For a strictly military association whose purpose is to "provide a common defense", this is certainly a most surprising duty to force upon its members.
With the issuance of resolution R-001 by the Omni-Tek Security Council ("OTSEC") on November 11, 29476, and the subsequent refusal to comply by the Council of Ares, OTSEC forces are poised to exercise their legally-conferred right to enter into Clan-occupied territory, and to arrest and prosecute members of the Council of Ares, so long as the non-signatory Clan community is not harmed. It is the choice of each individual Clan citizen to either stand aside or take militant action against OTSEC forces.
What must be realized, however, is that it was not the choice of the non-signatory Clan citizens to permit or refute the entry of OTSEC forces. As a result of the above, the Council of Ares has made that decision for you. They have denied your moral right to freedom of choice, and have thereby put your lives, and the lives of your families, at risk. This seems similarly foolish in the context of the defensive organization which claims to do nothing but good for the Clan community.
OPPRESSION OF SMALLER CLANS
After analyzing the Council of Ares’ gridsite (specifically the section outlining its constituent Clans), I have computed the following compositional shares of the supposedly democratic High Assembly, which are current on the site and in official records as at November 13, 29476:
- Clan Anarchist Syndicate: 355 members; 31% of High Assembly
- Backstab-Inc.com: 250 members; 22% of High Assembly
- Leet: 185 members; 16% of High Assembly
- Red Tigers: 109 members; 9% of High Assembly
- Mercury Dragons: 94 members; 8% of High Assembly
- Constrictor: 85 members; 7% of High Assembly
- RK Black Market: 55 members; 5% of High Assembly
- Vision: 20 members; 2% of the High Assembly
Total High Assembly members: 1,145
The Ares Pact contemplates a pro-rata decision-making structure of "one-member, one-vote", and, accounting for the November 12 member-list amendments, Clan Anarchist Syndicate nonetheless exercises a tremendous amount of power over its partners.
The November 12 press release issued by Fiqh, the PR Officer with Clan Anarchist Syndicate, states "[t]he Board of Guild Leaders has absolute legislative and executive authority of the Council of Ares until the enactment of the Ares Pact by the guilds' membership in an organisational vote." What he is implying is that Redruum (CAS), Windguaerd (MD), Fellowman (RT), Nikolae (Vision), Niktorius (Leet), Bigboa (Const), Gallic (BS) and Minatae (RKMB) – the eight leaders of the eight signatory Clans, amounting to a mere 0.7% of the signatories to the Ares Pact - are in charge of the lives, destines and futures of all signatory Clans, until the six-member Cabinet is elected by the High Assembly.
Without delving into too much detail, there is one fatal flaw with the manner in which this Cabinet is selected. Consider the following hypothetical situation, which contemplates a situation arising in which groups of five candidates are equally tied for all six Cabinet positions:
"if more than 5 candidates are eligible for the position by reason of equal vote counts, the Guild Leaders will vote…" [Article 5. Emphasis added]:
- candidates 1 through 5 are tied at n votes each;
- candidates 6 through 10 are tied at n-1 votes each;
- candidates 11 through 15 are tied at n-2 votes each;
…ad infinitum.
See the problem? The Board of Guild Leaders is handicapped by the emphasized provision above if the number of tied candidates does not exceed five, even if such dynamic exists in perpetuity.
The Ares Pact provides no mechanism for correcting this.
Furthermore, given that, based on available information, there are eight Clans comprising the Council of Ares, and further given that, pursuant to Article 4 of the Ares Pact there are to be only six Member of the Cabinet, it becomes readily apparent that two of the eight Clans will lack any say whatsoever in the governance and policy of the Council of Ares. Given the aforementioned shares, it should be quite clear that Vision will be one of those bound to an organization in which it lacks power to control its destiny.
It is worthwhile to note at this point that pursuant to Article 5 (paragraph three) of the Ares Pact only four of the eight Clans are currently in a position to ballot candidates, because Clans whose members number less than 100 are prohibited from introducing their own, unless they form a publicly-declared coalition with another signatory Clan and thereby surpass the 100-member requirement. This provision effectively denies these small Clans the right to individuality, and further eliminates any hope they may have at being represented in Cabinet.
Unfortunately, there are no effective mechanisms of recourse should any of the smaller signatory Clans wish to redress abuses by either the Cabinet or this select group of individuals. The most effective means of achieving this would be the formation of three "Constitutional Shuras" pursuant to Article 8 of the Ares Pact. However, given that the Vision Clan will be reduced to 19 members as a result of its leader renouncing his membership in Vision for membership in the Council of Ares (which is contemplated to be a recognized faction unto itself), it is precluded from forming a Shura in accordance with the Ares Pact, as such Shura requires a minimum of 20 members. Even if it fulfilled the 20-member requirement, the final decision is inevitably made by the Board of Guild Leaders, and as such the entire Shura mechanisms operates only at a token ceremonial level.
There are many other fatal flaws of this pact, but I only seek to address the most pressing points with respect to the current standoff between OTSEC and the Council of Ares.
To the members of the Vision Clan: If nothing else, no matter how loud you scream, your voice will be drowned in a sea of tyranny; I urge you to review the Ares Pact for yourselves before dooming your members to death at the hands of OTSEC’s forces.
To the non-signatory Clans: You are bound by this pact by virtue of implication; whether you accept the rule of the Council of Ares or not, they have seen fit to declare rule over you. They have also seen fit to draw you and your families into a war in which you previously had no part. Do not set a precedent of complacency in this matter – I can assure you it will haunt the balance of your days.