Heh, kinda a naive world-view you've got there. Black and White is always what people try to portray, but it is rarely the reality of the situation.
Let's take a realistic example for a moment... Iraq.
Today, Iraq is black.
Evil doers! Axis of evil! Weapons of mass destruction!
Let's ignore the fact that the US supplied them with most of their weapons... Why? Because we wanted them to fight off Iran for us, who at the time were potentially detabalizing to US interests in the Gulf.
Of course, us acting though another country to wage war against someone who is against our interests was always played down... Why? Because it's a very gray matter. Some people think it's right, some think it's wrong.
Now, getting back to Iraq... Here we are, flip-flopping against them simply because they have now been deemed "dangerous." Funny, that's the same thought we had about Iran back when Iraq was "White." Has Iraq changed since then? Not really. Saddam has gone through no policiy changes...he's always been the same, but we supported him when it was convinient, and go against him when it's in our own interests.
Let's throw yet another spin on things...many other countries view the US--possibly correctly--as evil for all our subversive influences and military measures in the Gulf simply to maintain our own interests in the region. Certainly, Iran did not threaten the US when we decided to wage a 2nd-hand war on them...no, they were dangerous to our interests. If they had succeeded in their bid to invade Iraq (which was their goal at the time), they would have gained a majority power in the Region. Unfortunately, they weren't on good terms with the US at the time, and thus could not be allowed by us to get that much control.
Interestingly enough, however, Iran waged war against Iraq for very much the same reasons we are waging war against them now: a buildup of military force suported by a dictatorial and unpridictable ruler. But, despite that, the US defended Iraq and supplied them with military force as well as intelligance.
...
So, tell me... In this little snapshot of a single course of events... Who's the bad guy? Who's the good guy? Who's neither? Who's both? Does it matter?
"Black" and "White" are idealistic goals that are almost never maintained. Humans do not fall into nice, predictible molds. There are always 100's of possible reasons for any event to take place. Trying to always boil issues down to 2 sides is overly simplistic and often inaccurate.
Questionaire:
Do you support Bush's war in Iraq?
a) Yes
b) I hate freedom
Do you support the "War on Terror"?
a) Yes
b) Osama is my hero!
Etc...
"Simple" questions can often have complex answers. Especially when human dynamics are thrown into the mix.
The moral of the story?
Forcing "Black and White" has no place in any situation where you intend to encourage realistic human interaction. Since MMORPG's (and Anarchy Online's marketing material!) in general are, by and large, more based on the community and social nature of its players, forcing a Black and White mold is terribly out of place.
-Jayde