Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: How about a UnderEquip rule?

  1. #1

    Lightbulb How about a UnderEquip rule?

    There is a OverEquipment rule
    then why not have a UnderEquipment rule?

  2. #2
    NOOOOOOOOOO

    How am I gonna get that QL 1 Paperhammer equipped????

    *giggle*
    .: Naraya :.

  3. #3
    Damn don't do that! How's my girlfriend going to get her swimsuit on??!!

  4. #4
    20% overequiped and your weapon gets realy low-damage
    20% underequiped and your weapon gets higher-damage

    Overequipped = u don't have the skillreq for the weapon after the buff veare off.

    Underequipped = u have more higher skills than nessesery.

  5. #5
    With higher attackrating (weaponskill)... don't you get better damage then? Higher critchance and such?

    I'd say that's close enough to what you suggest.

  6. #6
    hehe i am not too sure that would be smart

    Why? trader drains. My ql199 ithaca would be 25% underequiped when i get my drains running and with 132 wrangler from teammate or crat 100 addoff mod it might be 50% underequiped are you sure you want a trader wandering around with a gun like that
    engie + ghetto crowd control + no healing + lowest hp + worst evades + bot who is never around. = worst prof in game

    Bump for engie fix

  7. #7
    Not to mention people wouldnt have to buy new guns...


    /me senses the sarcasm in this thread
    215 Solitus Soldier RK1
    Advisor Midnight Reveries.

    Do politics exist? Yes.
    Who's involved in them? Anyone who wants to be.

    If you spend your time worrying about what everyone else is doing in their lives, you'll miss what's happening in yours.

  8. #8
    Originally posted by Wraith God
    Damn don't do that! How's my girlfriend going to get her swimsuit on??!!

    hehe wouldnt it be better if she lost all her clothes when she tried to put in on
    I am Dnastyone Official Broom pusher for The Professionals
    Painmage my newest funnest guy
    PHEAR ME RK1 Yazule IMMMM BACK

    I would have to say that this is an typicall example of how an flame should not look like. You need to think things through and calm down before you try to write an flame... Im sorry but I would rate this flame with an 1. Aggression is to high, grammar and cursing isnt to well planned... Maybe he has an point somewhere in there but I dont even want to find it. - Centurion3

    ROFLOL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •