Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Business model outdated

  1. #1

    Business model outdated

    Hi Funcom, I was curious to check back on my character a bit but I feel your business model is incredible outdated. You should really consider opening the entire game for free and seek income in making items for sale, much like your "The Secret World". €17,19 a month is just a bit silly for such an old game.
    Sometimes when I'm hungry.......I eat my own face!

  2. #2
    Going B2P would be the death for AO sadly, only way they can keep the little development they actually have on the game is by subscription. If the market for that isn't there, AO will get the nail in the coffin and get shoved off to the archive.

  3. #3
    at the same time I am positive I am not the only one who checks back and walks off again every 3-4 months when I notice nothing is done to the monthly fee yet
    Sometimes when I'm hungry.......I eat my own face!

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by scarygary View Post
    at the same time I am positive I am not the only one who checks back and walks off again every 3-4 months when I notice nothing is done to the monthly fee yet
    The main thing that has to be done with the monthly fee, is to make it less discriminatory towards Euro's and Brit's. Currency rates is hard for anarchy online apparently.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Pennypacker View Post
    The main thing that has to be done with the monthly fee, is to make it less discriminatory towards Euro's and Brit's. Currency rates is hard for anarchy online apparently.
    That is due to the VAT and EU taxes. I still wouldn't pay a monthly fee to play a game from 2002 and my characters again. Would I spend money on a cash shop? It all depends if it contain anything I would feel useful and of good value.
    Sometimes when I'm hungry.......I eat my own face!

  6. #6
    It's not mainly due to VAT and EU taxes, they had different prices for TSW for EU and US as an example when they released it with subscription.

    If you won't pay a monthly fee i highly doubt you'll pay the prices and amount needed from the item store to keep the game up and running with continuing development.

    Just face it, the current population doesn't warrant a B2P model for AO.

  7. #7
    while I agree I wish they game changed a bit I do not agree with the entire game going f2p, what I more believe in is that froobs should get access to SL just like they got access to NW many years ago...
    Emergenzee Level 220 'Trustworthy' Doctor
    Circle of Notum

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by scarygary View Post
    I still wouldn't pay a monthly fee to play a game from 2002 and my characters again.
    No offense, but just because you wouldn't doesn't mean the same for other people.

    AO is not TSW. AO comes from a generation of MMOs more akin to another 2002-ish game that, funnily enough. people have no problems continuing to pay sub fee for. You should try that game, it's pretty good. It's called Eve Online (ib4plex. Read Joel's update for this month, yo).

    At least for now, I don't think going B2P would be in the best interests of AO's long term survival. Also, we already have the froob program which offers the most generous "free trial" of any MMO I have tried so far.

    As a Brit I do agree something needs to be done about the difference in regional prices though.
    :E

  9. #9
    The price is simply TOO high imo. Add to that the lack of any real content updates & the very obvious pricing differences between countries & you can easily see why the population has dropped so severely the last few years.

    People vote with their wallets & it' getting more and more obvious that people don't want to pony up nowadays :/
    One profession to RoO them all, one profession to proc stun them, one profession to calm them all and in the darkness Exp perk them!

    Crataiken 220/30/70 General - Primal Evolution - 3rd AI 30 'Crat on RK 1 Setup
    Calms 220/30/70 General - Primal Evolution
    Medicaiken 220/30/70 General - Primal Evolution Setup
    Newen 220/30/70 President - The Galactic Milieu
    Mettagirl 220/20/** General - Primal Evolution
    Krataiken 150/18/40 General - Primal Evolution Setup

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Aiken View Post
    The price is simply TOO high imo. Add to that the lack of any real content updates & the very obvious pricing differences between countries & you can easily see why the population has dropped so severely the last few years.
    The pricing differences between countries is a deciding factor in declining population? Funny, then, how EU primetime is packed in AO and US primetime is practically dead.

    Also, guys, AO came out in 01. Not even late 01, mid 01.

  11. #11
    A solid 10 euro per month would be good price imo.

    What is baffling my mind over these years is that FC haven't adjusted the VAT ontop of the price, so that it should be equal to what americans pay, even though they get less profit out of it, it should be more fair.

  12. #12
    Many gamers that have been playing the same games for a very long time are often stuck in old mindsets. I was too for a long period. Now I realise you either have to adapt or contine your old route and narrow down the game to zero development and the small income is just the upkeep for a dedicated few.
    Sometimes when I'm hungry.......I eat my own face!

  13. #13
    Other games may be cheaper, but when it comes to value for money I have yet to find a game that can beat AO.
    $/hour wise I can not think of any other entertainment that can compete.

    I would of course not object to it bringe cheaper, but I really have a hard time finding reasonable objections to the current $/value ratio of AO.

    Also... subscription based payment suits me just fine, and provides for a more predictable income for AO/Funcom which makes it more likely to keep updates, new content and whatever else coming along the way the way I see it.
    Last edited by Mekh; Jul 4th, 2013 at 22:13:38.
    Mekhdoc 220/27/70 Equip | Mekh 220/28/67 Equip | Shadesch 220/21/70 Equip
    Mekhkeeper 220/22/70 Equip | Roflmao 220/15/50 | Fixyaself 200/23/64 Equip

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Mekh View Post
    Other games may be cheaper, but when it comes to value for money I have yet to find a game that can beat AO.
    $/hour wise I can not think of any other entertainment that can compete.

    I would of course not object to it bringe cheaper, but I really have a hard time finding reasonable objections to the current $/value ratio of AO.

    Also... subscription based payment suits me just fine, and provides for a more predictable income for AO/Funcom which makes it more likely to keep updates, new content and whatever else coming along the way the way I see it.
    of the many things i like about ao subscription price isnt one of them, theirs a number of f2p mmo's with cash shop that arent buy2win that if your patient enough you can play for literally nothing, that old republic went partially f2p is telling that the sub model is an outdated one certainly for the few patches ao gets per year. its probably more profitable for FC but dont try and convince me that its anything more than that

  15. #15
    WTB 1 year sub! 10b credits!

  16. #16
    hmm is scarygary = scarymary?

    if so: hi!

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by blindio View Post
    of the many things i like about ao subscription price isnt one of them, theirs a number of f2p mmo's with cash shop that arent buy2win that if your patient enough you can play for literally nothing, that old republic went partially f2p is telling that the sub model is an outdated one certainly for the few patches ao gets per year. its probably more profitable for FC but dont try and convince me that its anything more than that
    No1. reason: most f2p/p2w/farm2p MMOs suck {Edited by Venachar: Inappropriate phrase removed}. They are plain bad in comparison. The only MMO I have strongly considered playing other than AO is EVE and Ultima Online, both of them having subscription fees (I know EVE became partially farm2play but I rather pay than farm my brains out just so I can afford the next month).
    Those two MMOs being aged are still up and running. However, I would support the farm2play model as it would definitely increase the population and fix the economy. OK some people who still have zillions of credz out of less legitimate sources will be freebies, but it would still worth it. However any such changes must be made after the new engine hits live and not before
    Last edited by Venachar; Jul 5th, 2013 at 16:51:27.
    * Cryborg Nano-Technician - Have a shoulder to cry on!
    Aramlash Fixer - Can't catch me!
    Aramsunat Engineer - 4 Blockers of the Apocalypse


    Devil Inside

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Mekh View Post
    Also... subscription based payment suits me just fine, and provides for a more predictable income for AO/Funcom which makes it more likely to keep updates, new content and whatever else coming along the way the way I see it.
    When was the last content update again?

    I too prefer subscription based games as long as I find it good value for your money. I don't agree AO motivates its monthly fee. A game of this day and age is going to have hard time to keep up with the standards expected from players. This eventually leads to no or few new players coming in, no or few old players returning which inevitably going to make your playerbase smaller and smaller until there is nothing left. Logic right?

    The recently adapted RIFT model I believe will raise that bar even higher. I know AO can never compete with the modern MMO on the market, but then again..adapting the appropriate business model for the current time is vital to any games.
    Sometimes when I'm hungry.......I eat my own face!

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Aramsunat View Post
    No1. reason: most f2p/p2w/farm2p MMOs suck donkey balls. They are plain bad in comparison.
    I corrected it for you


    "No1. reason: I think most f2p/p2w/farm2p MMOs suck donkey balls. I think they are plain bad in comparison. "
    Sometimes when I'm hungry.......I eat my own face!

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by blindio View Post
    ... its probably more profitable for FC but dont try and convince me that its anything more than that
    Quote Originally Posted by Mekh View Post
    O
    Also... subscription based payment suits me just fine, and provides for a more predictable income for AO/Funcom which makes it more likely to keep updates, new content and whatever else coming along the way the way I see it.
    More profitable = more likely to result in better maintenance, updates and so on.
    Mekhdoc 220/27/70 Equip | Mekh 220/28/67 Equip | Shadesch 220/21/70 Equip
    Mekhkeeper 220/22/70 Equip | Roflmao 220/15/50 | Fixyaself 200/23/64 Equip

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •