Froob Org Prez

[MassDebater]

"Immature Name-calling Daddy Issue COD kiddy griefer noob pvpers" - Average "mature" PVMer on PVPers.

[Ahndracorvid]

"Immature Name-calling Daddy Issue COD kiddy griefer noob pvpers" - Average "mature" PVMer on PVPers.

It's also how some of us who enjoy PvP would label the bad eggs that give us such a negative image and push potential newcomers away.

[Gonido]

Back to the subject, has it been confirmed that froobs will be allowed back as org prez after merge is done ?

[Esssch]

Back to the subject, has it been confirmed that froobs will be allowed back as org prez after merge is done ?

It's been confirmed that they won't. See http://forums.anarchyonline.com/showthread.php?t=603425

"Froobs will no longer be allowed to become president of an organization."

[Tukzor]

Would be nice to know why we can't be presidents anymore. The only logical explanation i've got have had to do with server merge and city vouchers.

[cybertron]

Would be nice to know why we can't be presidents anymore. The only logical explanation i've got have had to do with server merge and city vouchers.

If u can find the thread from a few months ago, they mentioned it was because it was partly due to an exploit. No details given, but that was the reason.

[Tukzor]

If u can find the thread from a few months ago, they mentioned it was because it was partly due to an exploit. No details given, but that was the reason.

That explains everything. Thanks for sharing.

[Shuzzy]

i will not stepdown off my froob throne fc i shall retain my kingdom and my lot for what it is and it is mine

i shall never relinquish

signed froob prez

[Gimpeline]

It's been confirmed that they won't. See http://forums.anarchyonline.com/showthread.php?t=603425

"Froobs will no longer be allowed to become president of an organization."

- Froobs will no longer be allowed to become president of an organization.

It dosn't say anything about orgs that already have a froob president.
Guess we have to wait for a word from FC about what will happen to excisting froob presidents. RUR has one and we are still waiting for an answer.
But since then merge is "soon" there is no rush. They have a few years to sort it out

[Esssch]

- Froobs will no longer be allowed to become president of an organization.

It dosn't say anything about orgs that already have a froob president.
Guess we have to wait for a word from FC about what will happen to excisting froob presidents. RUR has one and we are still waiting for an answer.
But since then merge is "soon" there is no rush. They have a few years to sort it out

But that's not what he asked? He asked if they'll be allowed "back" as president.

As for current froob presidents, if you have a city, you'll lose it and won't get a voucher.

[Utopian]

- Froobs will no longer be allowed to become president of an organization.

It dosn't say anything about orgs that already have a froob president.
Guess we have to wait for a word from FC about what will happen to excisting froob presidents. RUR has one and we are still waiting for an answer.
But since then merge is "soon" there is no rush. They have a few years to sort it out

That would kind of defeat the stated purpose of correcting an "exploit" if they don't remove all froob presidents. But then again, this is FC.

[cybertron]

But that's not what he asked? He asked if they'll be allowed "back" as president.

As for current froob presidents, if you have a city, you'll lose it and won't get a voucher.

I thought that froob presidents will get the voucher in exchange for losing the city but since froob presidents can't actually do anything with the voucher and its nodrop, that's how you wont end up with a city.

Either way, will end up without a city after server merge if froob prez

[Esssch]

I thought that froob presidents will get the voucher in exchange for losing the city but since froob presidents can't actually do anything with the voucher and its nodrop, that's how you wont end up with a city.

Either way, will end up without a city after server merge if froob prez

Maybe that was it. I haven't kept track of it too much, cause frankly, I don't think froobs should be presidents of orgs that have cities. Generals, founders, president of org without city, sure.

[Gonido]

Maybe that was it. I haven't kept track of it too much, cause frankly, I don't think froobs should be presidents of orgs that have cities. Generals, founders, president of org without city, sure.

Bah who cares if they're president of orgs with or without city ? They can pass the title just for migration time and get it back later. What seems more important is that FC allows froob org president. Just fix that exploit if there's really one and let the froob be president of whatever org they like.

[Cogline]

So if Orgs are part of AO/NW and that's Froob but Cities are AI so not Froob why not change it so only Subs can be Org Prez with a City? Or is this dangerously close to logic/exposing the exploit? It's just that I wonder how Orgs functioned before there were Cities what with all the fuss.

[Therrito]

froobs are second class citizens

And this makes you better than them?
Some fr00bs have no choice.
They can't afford a paid account.
Your comment only gives the paid players a bad reputation as bigots.

[Gimpynoob]

No froob presidents means a few less 4 billions?