Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: I thought...

  1. #1

    I thought...

    well from what us NT's were told was that the next proffesion that was getting a buff was the NT. from what i can gather from the database its not us.. but Enforcers who are getting some love

    Why? i think we need it quite badly.. enforcers arent so bad.. CZ did post on the NT board saying that we will be getting the next proffession love.. but this is not the case

    /flip.

  2. #2
    maybe this is a fix.
    we get a nano programming buff!!! uber*!&@!*&@&!

    .

  3. #3
    This NP buff is too uber. I cannot in good concience continue to play the NT profession. I feel for you MAs and Fixers and Enforcers who are gimped. Maybe one day you will recieve an uber NP buff and be able to compete with the likes of us NTs and Engys!

  4. #4
    Perhaps the improvements to the NT profession just haven't gone to test yet? I'm thinking that the patch on test is possibly not all they plan for 14.6 and that things will be added over the course of the next month (or whenever 14.6 goes live).

  5. #5

    Re: I thought...

    Originally posted by Gunandahalf
    well from what us NT's were told was that the next proffesion that was getting a buff was the NT. from what i can gather from the database its not us.. but Enforcers who are getting some love

    Why? i think we need it quite badly.. enforcers arent so bad.. CZ did post on the NT board saying that we will be getting the next proffession love.. but this is not the case

    /flip.
    I agree that NT should have come before enforcer, we are middle of the road and have never seen love. We are not the most needy class and I will support NT love (and engi and solja).

    Please dont blame enforcers though, it was a complete surprise to us, though it isnt like we are not happy about it.

    I understand and agree with your point.
    I am Dnastyone Official Broom pusher for The Professionals
    Painmage my newest funnest guy
    PHEAR ME RK1 Yazule IMMMM BACK

    I would have to say that this is an typicall example of how an flame should not look like. You need to think things through and calm down before you try to write an flame... Im sorry but I would rate this flame with an 1. Aggression is to high, grammar and cursing isnt to well planned... Maybe he has an point somewhere in there but I dont even want to find it. - Centurion3

    ROFLOL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •