Healing Nerf Idea

[Avari]

1. with doc i have 3.1k init and still have to be 50% def (or it is 50% off ?) to be able instacast BI. So when i want heal (survive because of lack evades, absorbs, reflects) i cannot go full-def.

To which Klod comments:

Use CH, if you need insta-cast heal at full def.

Thus implying that full def + CH is just as viable as 50% agg/def + BI. Klod knows perfectly well that's bull ****, and that is why I say it's impossible to discuss with him. Klod almost never has anything objective to bring to the table, and deliberately leaves out details, that he knows are crucial to his statements. Just look at the 2-3 posts where he keeps comparing CH to BI because of the instant cast ability, when he knows perfectly well that the recharge makes them as equivalent as apples and oranges.

[Notcrattey]

Learn to play with your agg/def bar.

[schloops]

I find very reasonable that the class with the less offense/ccl/debuffs is hard to take down, one on one.

[-Klod-]

Thus implying that full def + CH is just as viable as 50% agg/def + BI. Klod knows perfectly well that's bull ****, and that is why I say it's impossible to discuss with him.

It was never meant to imply that it's more viable, or less viable. I was merely pointing out the possible options, since you are to lazy to fiddle with your agg/def bar already (BTW, you are not alone who has to deal with this - hint: SS).

Klod almost never has anything objective to bring to the table, and deliberately leaves out details, that he knows are crucial to his statements.

Says you.

Just look at the 2-3 posts where he keeps comparing CH to BI because of the instant cast ability, when he knows perfectly well that the recharge makes them as equivalent as apples and oranges.

Well, duh. It wouldn't be interesting if it had no downsides at all now, would it?

BTW, I never ever said they are equivalent, only comparable, to some point, with obvious downsides on both sides.

[Shrubberyman]

I find very reasonable that the class with the less offense/ccl/debuffs is hard to take down, one on one.

I kinda agree, but the "debuff" part is arguable. UBT and Malp do a great job crippling someone. Imo, more strain on the nanopool and local cooldowns will be enough of a balance. On the plus side, if cost and local cooldown are implemented, I don't see why Attack time of heals couldn't be changed to allow for full def capping.

[NoGoal]

I find very reasonable that the class with the less offense/ccl/debuffs is hard to take down, one on one.

I kinda agree, but the "debuff" part is arguable. UBT and Malp do a great job crippling someone. Imo, more strain on the nanopool and local cooldowns will be enough of a balance. On the plus side, if cost and local cooldown are implemented, I don't see why Attack time of heals couldn't be changed to allow for full def capping.

He's obviously talking about keepers.

[Shrubberyman]

Ahah