Please don't be foolishly insulting North. Your made the quoted statement and the next sentance was concerned with nanoshutdown. It was implied through your wording that you were lumping NSD in with the '3 minute' duration.Originally posted by North
If you would actually read what I wrote before making inaccurate statements.
"And Psiraven, nope I don't like being completely debuffed to uselesness for 3 minutes at the time."
- where was it that I said that Nano Shutdown is 3 minutes?
Most of the time I do get Divested or Init Debuffed, these both are nearly 3 minutes in duration.
Divest Skills (Advanced) - 3 minutes
Plunder Skills (Advanced) - 3 minutes
Uncontrollable Body Tremors- 2 minutes 35 seconds
Nano Shutdown - duration 1 minutes
So please, learn to read at least before calling people with names. We all probably bought eBay accounts to get our 190+ levels
BTW, read my previous post, if you think you can't beat NTs(if we get MC protection). You should really roll a trader now, and forget that you ever played MP, as you obviously have no idea how to use strenghts of your profession to your advantage. We have not been promised protection for all of our nanos, only for our damage nanos (MC), and if you don't see the difference you should really study closely how much we will lose when you cut off our defensive abilities (NS, NS MKII and Layered) and other nanos (Blinds, Neural Stunner, Roots and Calms).
Tell me how is it that we are going to cause you such a problem with our weapon and nukes only? When you still have pets, weapons and nukes? Oh, and you said that you are not a healing class...perhaps you should go and get yourself a heal pet
Sorry about last comments, but don't think they were anymore sarcastic then Psiraven's.
I do think MPs are very well balanced class, and if you think that NTs are whiners...perhaps it is because no other profession in this game has been nerfed as much as we have.
I have said before that I think debuffs should remain nasty, but there is a difference between click-a-button-to-win which they are today instead of what have been suggested in this forum.
I'm anyone reading that paragraph besides the guy who wrote it would fall into the implication as well. Picking a stupid choice of sentence structure and then insulting people who point it out isn't the way to hold an effective argument.