I love dueling other enforcers with my enforcer, I go out of my way to do so , other enforcers are a fun challenge to fight. And from my experience the 1he enforcers are the easiest to kill, wtih 1hb being harder, but still not as powerfull as 2hb users.
And when did I compare anything to ma's? Once again I simply stated that because a soldier's only valid weapons are 66/33 that ma's, enforcers (1hb/2hb), advents, fixers, agents, and traders would have higher attack ratings then soldiers. If anything I was comparing soldiers to ma's, not enforcers. Jeebus you're frikking paranoid arnt you?
Attack rating with my lvl 160 soldier - 950. If I had a weapon that used pure assault rifle I would have over 1k easy for attack. I still have a high attack rating yes, but I never said I didn't. I said that half the other proffs out there will have a higher attack rating using their chosen weapon vs a soldier with his. A 1he enforcer will probably have a little less attack rating then I. However a 2hb or 1hb enforcer *will* have more because they use 100% weapons. Why do you keep arguing about this?
I'd also interject the fact that using challenger any enforcer will have a higher attack rating then a soldier. I would if I wasn't aware of how useless challenger is to an enforcer at most levels, and so I don't count it as added attack rating.
I'm not drumming up enforcers as uber to make soldiers seem weak Phione, whatever you may be afraid of. I was simply stating a fact about attack ratings and how soldiers compare to a number of other proffs.
meh