As this posts name suggests I mean to ask myself and others some questions regarding the situation we had a short while ago where many clanners in CoT voted pro Sentinels.
How has it come to the point where everyday clanner freedom-desire has turned into a "new" freedom-desire where co-existence is no longer an option?
What would make clanners vote for a man (Silverstone) as spokesperson in a democratic Council who so obviously would not be a proper democratic leader. I mean, am I the only one who doesnt think Silverstone would ask a Council before acting?
What, if not peace-seeking, is the CoT? Atleast, a huge chunk of the CoT must be very willing to continue the hostile way when voting the way they did. Or am I wrong?
What kinds of people follow Simon Silverstone? Established diplomats? Fresh warriors from the ferry? Merchants? Wifes?!?
What made Silverstone decline? He had the chance. Why did he not? Either a very stupid desicion, or an extremely wise one.
Is Simon Silverstone a politician? I bet many out there picture Silverstone with guns blazing and not behind a chair in a board room. If so, then why root for him into a so obviously political position?
I for one have my own answers to these questions. But I dont want to make any of my own ideas about this public in this post. Instead I urge people from every side of the borders to let us all know what you think about this.
I would also like to see people stating theyre faction on this one so there will be no mistakes made regarding who says what.
This is in no way an attempt to raise a heated debate over this already touchy subject. What I would like to see is serious answers and questions. I bet there are many of us who holds theyre breath awaiting news from the CoT on what they decide next.
Hope to get many constructive answers and maybe even many new questions regarding this.
Nick Noodle
Agent of the Disciples of Omni-Tek