Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: President Windowlickers letter to Rubika

  1. #41

    Re: names from the list

    Originally posted by Windie
    Heroin :
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac.../1/name/heroin

    Darkghosty:
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac...ame/darkghosty

    Corgan:
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac.../1/name/Corgan

    Nadger:
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac.../1/name/Nadger

    Shubalubdub:
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac...me/Shubalubdub

    Polgra:
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac.../1/name/Polgra

    Crazypostman:
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac...e/crazypostman

    Tauceti5: (note that this is the only one not in First Order)
    http://www.anarchy-online.com/charac.../name/tauceti5

    I for one find it hard to believe that snarf did the research necessary to look up those people to 'set up' First Order
    [(almost forgot, a) I'm impressed that you thought to log leaders during that time, Luxxan, and b) I'm mortified that I couldn't even spell 'proud']


    Well, then explain a few things for me then.


    1. Why did it take you 4 or 5 days to come up with this "proof"... even though you've been arguing with me for at least that long.

    2. Why did you all claim Detonate did it, and now your backpedaling and saying he "Wasn't even there" .... According to your lists .. your not even COUNTING him, yet he was your 'prime suspect". Fishy.

    3. If Crazypostman was involved, and this was a calculated strike, then why isn't mention of him made by Snarf?



    So what, did you die and have your clanner friends take inventory of my members in the area?


    Why don't you just list my entire Faction, and claim we where the only ones that attended a scheduled EVENT, on prime time .. Friday night, that had been advertised on THIS board, ao-basher, and every other fansite around?


    Read our webpage, and let it absorb.. that is what First Order's policy's are, and that is what we are about.

  2. #42
    ..
    Last edited by Dropcid; Dec 12th, 2001 at 16:18:42.

  3. #43

    well...

    I, also am willing to let it drop, once the rage has cooled its not that big a deal. So, I'll do my last replies and leave it with a (hopefully) conciliatory note.

    As to the evidence, I was shocked that anyone actually logged the leaders channel. The text is right on (and gives a few hints on our interactions on the clan side) but again I was surprised anyone did it. So Kudos to Luxxan. I bet you could get several Clan leaders (many of which aren't involved with this debate at all) to support that text tho.

    As to Truwind and Snarf, they have a strange relationship I notice and seem to like ganking each other at any chance. I can only say that as the attack went on she sure didn't try to get anyone killed, and even protected me, or tried. That might make me a little prejudiced to her defence but I know she wasn't killing.

    Last thing, we didn't just list your whole faction because we, (Except maybe Snarf ) AREN'T out to get you or defame your guild. Part of the problem is that when 2 totally opposing views come up, you need to choose one, and naturally many people sided with people they knew (the Press was an issue too).

    All in all tho, there wasn't that much harm done, and you seem really sincere in defending your Guild from these accusations. I, for one am willing to let it go at that and go on and have normal relations if we ever meet ingame. I guess seeing you argue this over the last few days has at least given me a certain respect for your persistance and dedication to your guild, and I can respect that.

  4. #44

    Post Clear as Crystal

    Whether you are willing to "let this drop" or not there is no way First Order would be convicted by evidence as pathetic and inconsistent as this. Snarf is out to get us, and any other Omni Tek associates. Believeing in his lies and propaganda will only result in injustice. The finger pointing will continue but the guild leaders of Omni Tek have far too much integrity to convict anyone, Clan or Omni, on evidence as erratic as this.

  5. #45

    re

    Thanks for realizing that Windie,

    Honestly it's a VERY busy time of the year for everyone.

    And this kind of press, we really don't have time for to be completely honest with you.


    I still haven't finished buying presents damnit lol

  6. #46
    As a general of First Order and yes I was present at the event I can vouch for all First Order members that were at the event in saying that none of us were involved with the killing of Snarf.

    We all were there and all sat by and listened until the fight broke out in which I and some other generals yelled orders to get Windowlicker out of the zone protected... which is exactly what we did... It's a little hard to escort someone out of a zone without leaving ourselves that's a tad rediculous.

    Then of course that fabricated list pretty much contains only our generals. Do you really think that IF we were going to kill snarf we would have all of our high ranking officals out there taking pot shots??? No that would be awefully stupid to risk that especially since our guild stands by our rules and one is to completly obey the amnesty.

    I know i'm a bit late on posting this and the debate might already be over, but I was busy doing xmas stuff... I still felt that some of this needed to be said.

  7. #47
    Another thing ignored... one group does something bad, and should be punished. Players respond, demanding justice and Funcom sits idle.

    How much longer is this going to happen?

    What has it been? over two weeks with nothing going on? And before that... just traitors (who get ignored and forgotten)

    Yawn... talk about an immersive story.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •