As some of my fellow clans are aware, and for those that are not, Henry Radiman has called for the Council of Truth to reform. For the new council to work, we must not repeat the faults of the old council. The original Council of Truth failed because this body was composed of officals doing that which the majority of the people opposed, and only stood to promote peace between all sides of the conflict. Two such examples are the amnesty and Sabulum.
Amnesty. The Council called forth our clans leaders to hear their views on the amnesty and how the leaders wanted to proceed. The majority, if not all, of the leaders declined the amnesty. The Council meet internally, discussed how the amnesty would favor peace and despite the majority vote sent spokesperson Henry Radiman onward to accept Phillip Ross' amnesty. The amnesty ultimatly failed because the majority of clans didn't want any such peace offering at the time.
Sabulum. Omni-Tek enters Sabulum in search of criminals. The majority of clans did not want Omni-Tek in clan terrority and used whatever force necessary to remove the Omni-Tek troops. A day later, Henry Radiman asks clans not to interfer with Omni-Tek's operations in Sabulum, that the Council of Truth supported Omni-tek operations. Naturally, the Council saw to agree to Omni-Tek's actions because that was the most peaceful course of action. Three days later, clans drive Omni-Tek from Sabulum.
Soon thereafter, the Council of Truth withdrew from public view and was dormant until the clans rallied for the Council to wake up and take action. The Council woke. However, clans had their doubts as to if the Council would perform. Within two months the Council disbanded. The Council of Truth failed because they did not uphold democracry, that which clans are fighting for, but rather did as necessary to uphold peace.
Now, back to present.
Sat in the Council yesterday and listened to Radiman's wishes to reinstate the Council of Truth. Then, stood and listened to a small group begin forming a 'pre-council' whereas they would oversee to the construction of this new council. I did not partake in this group for two reason, the first of which I stated alloud.
One, what more does Radiman have to say regarding the reformation of the Council of Truth? More specficially, which I did not say alloud, does Radiman want this reformed council to proceed as the old council whereas peace outweighs democracy?
Two, the group of people whom were forming the 'pre-council' appeared to have already decided who would be members; calling out their friends, allies and anyone who shared their views. Clans that opposed their views, such as Sentinels, were ignored and more than likely would, and will, never be extended an invitation.
Since this 'pre-council' as already begun excluding clans they have already failed. They have already repeated the previous Council of Truths mistake of ignoring democracy; denying everyone a voice.
The council can reform. But, the new council can not and must not ignore one of the very concepts in which we are fighting. Should a new council form, anyone and everyone should be alloud to attend as everyone has a voice in democratic society.
Thank you for your time.
Safe travels,
Abram Kerans