CoT Policy Proceedings: A Proposal
To The Council of Truth:
I do not believe that Clan organizations on the whole would disagree to send a representative to discussions of Policies that should be adopted by the The New CoT under these following terms:
- CoT Policy adoption proceedings are open forum discussions: In no way does presence of clan representatives at these proceedings are to be considered "in support the New CoT" but are in support of creating a dialogue amongst Clan organizations and the New CoT in order to objectively achieve a list of policies that are mutually agreed.
- Voting on Policies: 3/4's vote of the representatives in atendance is needed to pass a policy
- Adoption of Policy: Once a policy is passed by 3/4 majority it is considered adopted and becomes the domain of The New CoT in the future.
- Untouchable policies: Policies that are voted on and recieve less than 3/4 vote are to be considered the domain of the individual Clan organizations on Rubi Ka. They will set their own policy on such issues.
- Right to Leave Forum: Clan Organizations can at any time leave the forum if they feel they are at an impasse with policy discussions
Humbly yours,
Khastity
Re: CoT Policy Proceedings: A Proposal
- CoT Policy adoption proceedings are open forum discussions: In no way does presence of clan representatives at these proceedings are to be considered "in support the New CoT" but are in support of creating a dialogue amongst Clan organizations and the New CoT in order to objectively achieve a list of policies that are mutually agreed.
- Interpretation: We commit to nothing.
- Untouchable policies: Policies that are voted on and recieve less than 3/4 vote are to be considered the domain of the individual Clan organizations on Rubi Ka. They will set their own policy on such issues.
Interpretation: If the vote didn't go our way, we will ignore what the majority feels is right and do whatever we feel like.
- Right to Leave Forum: Clan Organizations can at any time leave the forum if they feel they are at an impasse with policy discussions
Interpretation: See above and above.
Good pRoPoSaL.
Meister Get your facts straight
Meister get your facts straight:
- False Fact:
Quote:
Originally posted by Meister I don't buy this peaceful council crap with people like her among it.
True Fact: I am not a member of the New Council of Truth
- False Fact:
Quote:
Originally posted by Meister she ruins the clans' notum business as well and still is left in charge of it.
True Fact: I am not in charge of clan Bussiness policy for Notum Production. I only issue statements of policy for an organization. Who is a client of mine and whose name will not be disclosed and is protected under Client /Attorney privledge.
- False Fact:
Quote:
Originally posted by Meister you cannot even run notum production and distribution properly? What a joke.
True Fact: The clans have been running our Notum production facilities for hundreds of years or have you failed to notice that.
Get your facts straight Meister
Khastity
Re: Re: CoT Policy Proceedings: A Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevver
Good policy.
It isn't a policy it is a proposal on how we should conduct our discussions....I guess you forgot to read the Post Subject line that says
A Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevver
Interpretation: If the vote didn't go our way, we will ignore what the majority feels is right and do whatever we feel like.
This is intended to be modeled after federal governmental organizations, which allows for individual provencial rights to be decided upon provencially and not interfered with by the central government which I do believe the Council of truth is trying to attempt to become. This system recognizes the autonomy of the Provences and their residents to govern in designated situations and at the same time eases the centralized governments burdens in administration...it is a form of government that probally best suits the clans..
Oh I forgot Nevver you are an employee of a corporation...corporations are feudalistic in nature.....which means you are a serf....Serfs were Owned by their Lords...essentially a Slave.
Khastity
Re: Re: Re: CoT Policy Proceedings: A Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Khastity
Oh I forgot Nevver you are an employee of a corporation...corporations are feudalistic in nature.....which means you are a serf....Serfs were Owned by their Lords...essentially a Slave.
Slaves aren't payed outrageous salaries, bumpkin.
Re: CoT Policy Proceedings: A Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Khastity
To The Council of Truth:
I do not... ...they feel they are at an impasse with policy discussions[/list]
Khastity
Memo
**********************************
To: Khastity
From: Andrew 'Boomtastic' Domtar
Re: Letters to the Council
**********************************
Mdm.
I am sure you know but in case you don't know there is a forum for the CoT that your welcome to post messages for the staff to read, not that they don't read this forum..
It would be at the Council of Truth forums. Please feel free to post there if you wish.
Peace favor you,
Andrew