I know how it can happen, it just doesn't happen as often as you would like people believe it does or you think it does. You're only fooling yourself really. Good troll though, especially since this thread ISN'T just about advy's.
Printable View
first of all a trox enf will have either MR or higway + wit.
second of all to get 3900 AR u need to be in an offencive setup so no 300 def then either.
third of all u would need to get first rage proc to fire then 2 challanger procs to fire .. the gswap ur challanger proc and get the higher one to fire while all the other procs are running.....
soo grats to all of u guys that trolls and tries to get people that doesnt know about the enforcer profession to think that enfs actually can get those numbers...
Highway+DB buffs on an opifex for the def :p Other than that, Sultry has the right idea :)
5 LE procs firing while highway is running on an opifex enforcer is all you need to be OP.
What next, stats on nanomage enfo?
a lot of changes are expected to be made with the profession rebalancing, however this thread has too much whine about profession toolsets. Not every profession has to have a defense, they can instead have better offensive toolsets but no defense to make up for them, and some professions will be inbetween. "Balance" doesn't mean every profession has to have similar arsenals with just different names.
Haha.
Nice try. Do you really think that people are not aware how ridiculously overpowered radvies are? You are underestimating people if you think that your 1+1=3 type of argument will have any affect, except old farts like me destroying your argument which drips lameness and inconsistency.
It never stops to amaze me how far people can go with absolute inequalities when trying to defend something so horribly screwed.
I don't get the reason why you feel you have to be so mentally offensive towards others to get others to accept your viewpoint, but I have said nothing that goes against anything that you have pointed out, especially about ranged advies. They are overpowered, and this is one of the reasons why a serious rebalancing is expected to happen hopefully sometime around a few months.
Relax please.
Don't worry this is the case in many mmorpgs when with some new changes one profession unintentionally gets powerful, then they nerf him or buff other professions and then another profession gets powerful. Remember the keepers in 2006-2007.
Though I could say advies were always a lovechild :P
I finally have a 220/30/70, full CSS, full alpha, full whatchamacallit Advy.
It's boring.
Can't die. Rush in.. unleash what you got.. rush out... wait for recharge, rinse repeat, get kills.
Not sure where's the challenge.
Hey don't nerf my advy now..
>obligatory random troll post<
People dont mind being killed in PVP (really)
What people mind is feeling completely helpless/completely useless. Its why people hate
a) Stupidly long roots
b) being rooted as melee
c) Debuffs
d) Ridiculous crap like adv defence
Because you can do everything possible, be the best player in the world, and nothing will alter the outcome. You could twink the most awesome damage ever, does nothing if someone can evade it by, uh, rolling a class at startup.
Bio Coccoon and DOF/Limber need to lock each other out.
Make morphs only apply if using melee (or make them nerf pistol skill by -5000)
Would make advs reasonably balanced, and balance out melee/ranged advy worries. (somewhat)
My gf (who has had a perfectly geared ranged adv since day 5 of LoTX :p) prefers to play her crat (mainly) or Engineer simply because adventurers are stupidly OP defence wise. She isnt the most hardcore PVP'er, and even she realises it isnt fun to play a ranged adv right now, as it just doesn't feel 'fair'
She's also very bitter about all these FOTM ranged users, having being ranged since day one.
Well, u gotta think about the profession creating at the start too
it displays how HARD the prof is to play with =)
advy is set on easy i think, that explains it for me then
^^ How easy it is to play is not the same as how OP it is to PVP with the same prof.